The Cincinnati Reds outbid several major league baseball teams (including the Washington Nationals, apparently) for the services of Cuban left-handed pitcher Aroldis Chapman. Reds' GM Walt Jocketty shelled out $30 million (spread out over ten years, according to reports) for the hard-throwing, but untested, 22-year old.
Chapman is said to have "a plus-plus fastball that sits in the mid-90s and has touched 101 (legitimately); the fastball has good tailing life, and he flashes a plus slider with good tilt," according to ESPN.com's Keith Law. That type of talent, paired with the Nats No. 1 overall pick from last summer's draft, Stephen Strasburg, had Nats execs drooling of a potentially lethal 1-2 punch.
But in the same article about Chapman, Law explains:
His changeup remains a work in progress, although he probably hasn't had to use it much given the competition he's faced.
On the downside, his command isn't great. Although his arm is loose and his velocity comes easily, he's still raw as a pitcher and has a fair amount of development ahead of him in the short term.
Chapman is a work in progress, and the Reds just doled out twice as much money, guaranteed, than the Nats paid Strasburg last season.
It's interesting to see that the final players in the Chapman sweepstakes were Cincinnati, Oakland, and Washington--teams that typically are known for being tight with their money. Where were the big market teams driving up the asking price? Where were teams with playoff aspirations? Where were the Yankees?
Law again provides some insight:
There's also some economic logic behind the greater interest from low-revenue teams in these top amateur players. An impact player, even if he's still merely a potential one such as Chapman, is worth more to a team like Cincinnati or Oakland than he is to a New York or a Boston because those latter teams are already looking at 90-plus-win seasons.
Still, was Chapman worth this risk? He had been competing with the Cuban National team before defection, but his level of competition was nothing compared to even that of Strasburg, whose only knock on him coming out of college was the fact that he played in the Mountain West Conference. Chapman has been pitching against teenagers and other undeveloped competition in Cuba.
I'm not saying that the Reds, or the Nats, were wrong in going after Chapman and paying for his potential. It just strikes me strange that the Yankees, Red Sox, Angels and other big market teams seemed to be not more involved in the process.
As far as the Nats involvement, it's just good to know that they had a ceiling in the negotiations. From Nationals Journal, quoting Stan Kasten:
"There's a limit to what you can spend for an unproven pitcher."
Especially one that is as unproven and untested as Chapman.


